Hugh de Baliol succeeded Eustace (the elder) as head of the family. He was certified by the Crown to hold the barony of Biwell (paying five knights'' fees). He also was required to find 30 soldiers for the guard of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, as his ancestors had done since the time of William Rufus. Also, as a gift from Henry II, Hugh was made lord of Hiche in Essex. Later, from King John, he obtained the lands of Richard Unfronville and of Robert de Meisnell in County York -- this for his support of the king in the baronial war. In 1216, de Baliol joined with Philip de Hulcotes in defense of the northern border with Scotland. When the Scottish king subjugated the whole of Northumberland for Lewis of France, de Baliol and de Hulcotes firmly held all the fortresses on the line of the Tees. Barnard Castle was particularly notable in this defense (3). Hugh received King John at Barnard Castle at this time, and for a short while was besieged there by Alexander II of Scotland who wished to "espie whether it was assailable at any side." The castle at that time was apparently too strong to afford an easy conquest (2).
Hugh de Baliol was also described by Dugdale as having "benefitted himself not a little in the troublesome times of King John and, even at the great entrance of Henry III, could not forbear his wonted course of plundering."(2) Hugh was married to Cecily de la Fontaine. Some time around 1228, he was succeeded by his son John who, having been born at Barnard castle about 1216, would have been a meer adolescent at the time.
Hugh de Baliol was also described by Dugdale as having "benefitted himself not a little in the troublesome times of King John and, even at the great entrance of Henry III, could not forbear his wonted course of plundering."(2) Hugh was married to Cecily de la Fontaine. Some time around 1228, he was succeeded by his son John who, having been born at Barnard castle about 1216, would have been a meer adolescent at the time.
- ABT. 1182 - Birth - ; Gainford, Durham, England
- 2 FEB 1228/29 - Death -
? | ||||||
? | ||||||
? | ||||||
? | ||||||
| PARENT (M) Eustace de Baliol | |||
| Birth | |||
| Death | |||
| Marriage | to ? | ||
| Father | Bernard de Baliol | ||
| Mother | ? | ||
| PARENT (U) ? | |||
| Birth | |||
| Death | |||
| Father | ? | ||
| Mother | ? | ||
| CHILDREN | |||
| M | Hugh de Baliol | ||
| Birth | ABT. 1182 | Gainford, Durham, England | |
| Death | 2 FEB 1228/29 | ||
| Marriage | 1205 | to Cecily de la Fontaine at Gainford, Durham, England | |
| M | Henry de Baliol | ||
| Birth | |||
| Death | 1245 | ||
| Marriage | to Lauretta | ||
| M | Eustace de Baliol | ||
| Birth | |||
| Death | |||
| Marriage | to Hawise de Levyngton | ||
| PARENT (M) Hugh de Baliol | |||
| Birth | ABT. 1182 | Gainford, Durham, England | |
| Death | 2 FEB 1228/29 | ||
| Marriage | 1205 | to Cecily de la Fontaine at Gainford, Durham, England | |
| Father | Eustace de Baliol | ||
| Mother | ? | ||
| PARENT (F) Cecily de la Fontaine | |||
| Birth | 1182 | Aberdeen, Scotland | |
| Death | |||
| Marriage | 1205 | to Hugh de Baliol at Gainford, Durham, England | |
| Father | Aleaume de la Fontaine | ||
| Mother | Laurette de St. Valerie | ||
| CHILDREN | |||
| F | Ada de Baliol | ||
| Birth | 1206 | Barnardcastle, Durham, England | |
| Death | 29 JUL 1251 | Stokesby, Durham, England | |
| Marriage | to John De Stokes Baron of Walton | ||
| M | John de Baliol | ||
| Birth | 1216 | ||
| Death | |||
1 Hugh de Baliol b: ABT. 1182 d: 2 FEB 1228/29
+ Cecily de la Fontaine b: 1182
2 Ada de Baliol b: 1206 d: 29 JUL 1251
+ John De Stokes Baron of Walton b: ABT. 1181 d: ABT. 1240
3 Robert de Stokes b: ABT. 1203 d: ABT. 1280
4 Richard de Stokes b: ABT. 1231 d: ABT. 1312
+ ?
5 Edmund de Stokes b: ABT. 1268 d: AFT. 1307
+ ?
6 Richard de Stokes b: ABT. 1301
6 Thomas de Stokes b: ABT. 1305
6 John de Stokes b: ABT. 1307
5 Richard de Stokes b: ABT. 1272 d: AFT. 1327
+ Alice
5 William de Stokes b: ABT. 1279 d: AFT. 1296
5 Robert de Stokes b: ABT. 1281 d: AFT. 1340
+ ?
4 Adam de Stokes b: ABT. 1229 d: 1313
+ Eve b: ABT. 1239 d: 1335
4 Roger de Stokes b: ABT. 1233 d: 1312
+ ?
+ ?
6 Robert de Stokes b: ABT. 1303 d: AFT. 1370
+ Margaret b: ABT. 1306
7 John de Stokes b: ABT. 1329 d: 1370
+ Lucy b: ABT. 1331
8 Thomas Stokes b: ABT. 1357
+ ?
9 Robert Stokes b: ABT. 1387 d: AFT. 1440
+ ?
10 Thomas Stokes b: ABT. 1413 d: AFT. 1464
+ ?
10 John Stokes b: ABT. 1415 d: AFT. 1438
10 William Stokes b: ABT. 1417
9 Thomas Stokes b: ABT. 1383 d: AFT. 1433
9 John Stokes b: ABT. 1385 d: AFT. 1424
8 John Stokes b: ABT. 1355 d: AFT. 1424
8 Alice Stokes b: ABT. 1359
7 Richard de Stokes b: ABT. 1327 d: AFT. 1379
7 Nicholas de Stokes b: ABT. 1331 d: AFT. 1361
7 Edmond de Stokes b: ABT. 1331 d: AFT. 1383
3 Roger de Stokes b: ABT. 1201 d: 1248
3 Andrew de Stokes b: ABT. 1205
3 Hugh de Stokes b: ABT. 1207 d: AFT. 1242
3 John de Stokes b: ABT. 1209 d: AFT. 1243
3 William de Stokes b: ABT. 1211 d: AFT. 1242
2 John de Baliol b: 1216

